Broker: CMHC suggestion is ‘crazy’

Broker: CMHC suggestion is ‘crazy’

Broker: CMHC suggestion is ‘crazy’ A proposal by the crown corporation to increase the minimum down payment would unfairly harm an important home buyer cohort, argues one professional.

“I think it’s crazy. If he wants to contain house prices from rising, I guess you could do that,” Vas Anton, a mortgage broker with Excel Mortgage, told “But how do you argue you can address affordability by increasing the minimum down payment?”

Late last week Evan Siddall, CMHC’s chief executive officer, suggested to an audience in London at the Bank of England panel on housing finance policy that minimum down payments should be increased in a bid to address housing affordability issues.

“Politicians are tempted to help first-time home buyers enter the market, but low down payments may be part of the problem adding to affordability pressures and macroeconomic vulnerabilities,” Siddall said in the speech, which was published on CMHC’s website.

But it’s first-time homebuyers that should be given a helping hand, according to Anton.

“I see day in and day out people are having issues scraping by with 5% and then they would have to do double that. So you’re putting home ownership even further away from your average Joe,” he said. “People buying a $6,$7,$800,000 property would probably be fine with a 10% downpayment, but if you’re buying between $250,000 and $300,000 I think they would (struggle).”

According to Anton, Canadians who already own homes could pony up the extra cash by tapping into equity they have already built.

The same can’t be said, however, for first-time homebuyers and new Canadians, however.

“But ask my son who is 21 and graduating from college next year if he’d be able to handle that. Unless I step in and say here sonny boy, here’s $13,000, go buy yourself a house,” Anton said. “What about new immigrants? How much money do you expect them to put aside.”

Related Stories:
Low down payments might be introducing more risk - CMHC
Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp. passes stress test extreme scenarios
  • Omer Quenneville 2016-11-23 9:24:37 AM
    In the city of Toronto trade up buyers will need a minimum $60,000 for expenses just to trade up due to the double land transfer tax. This is the real cause of housing prices being so high. The trade up buyer is squeezed out creating a shortage of listings. How would you expect them to be able to "pony up". For something that is paid for with after tax dollars and is suppose to be a tax free investment, it certainly comes with one heck of an expensive tax bill.
    Post a reply
  • LanceH 2016-11-23 9:24:46 AM
    The whole purpose of CMHC was to assist Cdn's to get into home ownership. This proposal is the opposite of that mandate. Going back 25yrs ago, a CMHC study showed that the biggest barrier to home ownership, was the down payment, not the monthly payments. So they found ways to lower the entry. What this guy is really doing, is blaming the shortage of supply on CMHC and the buyers, rather than the myriad of other issues causing the problem. This is why you want Gov to simply "stay out of it". They "don't get it". This is so typical, laying blame in all the wrong places, so they end up stacking one harmful policy on top of another making things worse and worse!!
    Post a reply
  • KJL 2016-11-23 9:25:52 AM
    Cannot agree more. WTF most would say. If you a re buying 4 a second time, then sure 10. But for the first timers, 5 should always suffice . Stop messin with the people.
    Post a reply