“The argument that trailer fee models would enhance underwriting standards is a hard argument to make here in Canada,” Ron Butler
Butler Mortgage said on MortgageBrokerNews.ca. “Underwriting standards are so high here now if they got any higher, lenders would be asking for drone surveillance and genetic testing on applicants.”
The suggestion to move to a fee-based structure came from Australia’s regulatory body.
“Experience has shown that commissions paid upfront tend to encourage less rigorous attention to loan application quality,” concludes a recent guideline paper from the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, the Down Under equivalent of FSCO.
The assertion – brokers are more likely to withhold key client information under the tradition system of remuneration than the trailer model – was echoed by several Australian lenders in August as part of a broad regulatory inquiry process meant to better protect the country’s broker channel.
But Canadian brokers aren’t sold.
“I agree with Ron Butler
that underwriting standards are already very high here,” Layth Matthews of RateMiser wrote. “Putting brokers under more pressure to do the underwriting negates the way that most lenders see brokers in the first place - sales forces.”
Still, that doesn’t detract from the potential benefits of a fee-based model, according to Matthews, who laid out some positive points about the structure.
“I like trailers because I think they increase objective communication between the client, the lender, and the broker,” Matthews wrote. “If more lenders offered trailer comp, I think clients and the economy would benefit from longer-term thinking.”
Canadian brokers don’t buy the premise that a move from an up-front commission-based structure to a fee-based model will result in better loan quality.