Forum

Broker news forum is the place for positive industry interaction and welcomes your professional and informed opinion.

Notify me of new replies via email
Mortgage Broker News | 11 Oct 2016, 08:15 AM Agree 0
Buyers would be spooked and construction would be slowed as a consequence of the regulatory changes, BCREA chief economist cautions
  • Tomas | 11 Oct 2016, 09:44 AM Agree 0
    I guess prices can't come down?
  • LanceH | 11 Oct 2016, 10:20 AM Agree 0
    Tomas. It might drive down prices outside of the GTA, but the GTA has such a shortage of ppty's it will only reduce the number of bidders. Writing a policy for the entire country to cool one region, is out of whack!
  • LanceH | 11 Oct 2016, 10:25 AM Agree 0
    If one wants to write something thoughtful to Morneau, here's his email; bill.morneau@canada.ca. Here's what I wrote;

    Hi Bill

    Unintended consequences?

    If the stress test you're implementing isn't permanent - what happens? What's the chances that it gets switched back at some point in the future by yourself or another government? I think the chances are rather high.

    What will happen is a mass rush from the pent-up demand you created with this policy. With all those millennials scrambling to finally buy, their will be a shortage of ppty's culminating in bidding wars and mass price increases. Right back where you started!

    The prospects of interest rates going up by 2%, is not realistic. I read a report the other day it was expected to stay the same for the next 2yrs. I've read similar reports time and again over the lat 8yrs.

    You know, you could do the discount Rate + .5% (2.39 + .50 = 2.89%). Nothing says you have to do it the same as the stress test for the variable rate no? And with this option, you can tweak it further, crank it up a 1/4 point at a time say, if need-be. You give yourself more flexibility this way. A more nuanced approach with built-in flexibility is always better no?
  • Ad Lakhanpal,Mortgage Broker | 12 Oct 2016, 01:04 PM Agree 0
    Government policies need to change and evolve but generally the changes are done in consultation with the key players in the industry to avoid unintended consequences. I wonder why there were no consultation this time. It seems to me that major banks were behind this to weaken the mono-lines who provide the competition which benefits consumers. Consumers will also be hurt in several other ways. First time buyers will have restricted ability to buy. Some people who booked houses in new construction will not qualify to close the deals. Supply of rental properties will go down. If you can't buy and can't rent,where do you go? Some people will not be able to refinance to consolidate debts and may have to sell or declare bankruptcy. I am sure there are many more consequences.

    I think the Government needs to delay implementation and take a good hard look at the changes being proposed before inflicting them on the consumers.
  • Rob | 12 Oct 2016, 08:23 PM Agree 0
    The housing market is totally down the toilet in rural Ontario. Has been for years. Been trying to sell my house for 5 years. Newer ranch bungalow, large 2800 sqft shop, 1 acre property. Beautiful. $280000. Finally got an offer and got everything approved. 2 days before the closing CMHC came back and said no. Now they wanted my buyer to put 20% down after their 10% down was approved. I already put a down payment on another house. Any help with CMHC wouls be very appreciated
  • Kelly Rowe | 13 Oct 2016, 03:46 PM Agree 0
    Rob, maybe your buyers lender should try Genworth? What happened I wonder to change the approval?
Post a reply