Forum

Broker news forum is the place for positive industry interaction and welcomes your professional and informed opinion.

Notify me of new replies via email
Mortgage Broker News | 12 Jun 2013, 12:00 AM Agree 0
Getting a straight answer from a bank on a client’s loan is like pulling teeth, says one investment player expert in reducing mortgage penalties.
  • Kiah Grant | 12 Jun 2013, 09:56 AM Agree 0
    TD has a similar policy, if you get the penalty statement "locked in" they have to cancel it or payments will end, I had a client in bi-weekly and because rates were dropping we got a statement issued and during the time we were analyzing the situation she went into arrears because the biweekly payment was not collected.
  • NMHamblin | 12 Jun 2013, 10:11 AM Agree 0
    Not only should they be held accountable for the misinformation they provide clients but they should be investigated for the way they calculate and the penalty from posted rate and not actual rates as the mono lines do. Just another gouge by the banks and no one in government or media will try and hold them accountable or make them justify it!
  • Paolo Di Petta | dipettamortgage.com | 13 Jun 2013, 05:27 AM Agree 0
    More than anything, I think we need to make our current and future clients aware of these practices. We need to show them how malicious and opaque the big banks really are.
  • Catherine Fogarty/catherinefogarty.ca | 13 Jun 2013, 09:45 AM Agree 0
    I have stated this before...the bank reps all of the sudden have a mouth full of marbles when asked specific questions regarding the structure of a mortgage contract. Anyone for a Marble game of Ringer for Keepsies?
  • kac | 13 Jun 2013, 10:38 AM Agree 0
    the government has imposed lending rules to curb consumers from getting into debt trouble while banks continue to offer credit card limits and auto loans that are enough to sink the consumer while limiting them from the most secured debt which is a mortgage. They really try and justify it in preaching it is for the consumers protection. Why are they not protecting the consumer from unsecured debt. It is 100 times harder qualifying for a mortgage than a $60,000 auto loan with no money down. The banks continue to reap huge profits and their ceo's are paid 7 figure salaries. If a consumer runs into credit trouble they are no longer able to refinance their mortgage to get over the hurdle and could face sometimes a $30,000 penalty to sell their house which further goes into the banks pocket. When are the gate keepers that run the asylum going to really look into the consumers best interests?
  • John | 15 Jun 2013, 11:40 AM Agree 0
    While CAAMP is lobbying the government on Mortgage changes perhaps they could talk to them about having standardized maximum charges for penalties. The last change that required better disclosure of penalties didn't address the problem, THEY ARE CHARGING TOO MUCH!! Maybe a maximum rate on credit cards is in order too. Prime plus 18.9 on a visa and prime plus 27 on a debt store card seems a little high don't you think? Same issue, all they did was require credit card companies to disclose that it will take 27 years to pay off the card if you pay the minimum payment. Again not enough!
  • Paolo Di Petta | dipettamortgage.com | 17 Jun 2013, 06:01 AM Agree 0
    Great point John! That would be a much better use of their member's resources.
Post a reply